Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 21
Filtrar
1.
Salud Publica Mex ; 64(5, sept-oct): 530-538, 2022 Aug 26.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36130340

RESUMO

OBJETIVO: Proporcionar recomendaciones para la detección temprana de pacientes con alto riesgo de desarrollar cáncer de pulmón (CP) en el primer nivel de atención y su referencia oportuna. Material y métodos. Se realizó una búsqueda detallada de la evidencia científica disponible para responder las preguntas de investigación clínica y se utilizó el Panel Delphi modificado para lograr un consenso entre expertos. RESULTADOS: Se generaron 14 recomendaciones siguiendo los estándares de una GPC. Conclusión. El CP representa un problema de salud pública en México; por ello, esta guía establece recomendaciones que apoyan la toma de decisiones sobre la detección precoz y la referencia de pacientes con sospecha de CP en el primer nivel de atención.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , México , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Estudos Retrospectivos
2.
JCO Glob Oncol ; 8: e2100251, 2022 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35245084

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The HOLA COVID-19 study sought to evaluate the impact of COVID-19 on oncology practices across Latin America (LATAM), challenges faced by physicians, and how practices and physicians adapted while delivering care to patients with cancer. METHODS: This international cross-sectional study of oncology physicians in LATAM included a 43-item anonymous online survey to evaluate changes and adaptations to clinical practice. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the association of caring for patients with COVID-19 and changes to clinical practice. RESULTS: A total of 704 oncology physicians from 19 countries completed the survey. Among respondents, the most common specialty was general oncology (34%) and 56% of physicians had cared for patients with COVID-19. The majority of physicians (70%) noted a decrease in the number of new patients evaluated during the COVID-19 pandemic when compared with prepandemic, and 73% reported adopting the use of telemedicine in their practice. More than half (58%) of physicians reported making changes to the treatments that they offered to patients with cancer. In adjusted models, physicians who had cared for patients with COVID-19 had higher odds of changing the type of chemotherapy or treatments that they offered (adjusted odds ratio 1.81; 95% CI, 1.30 to 2.53) and of delaying chemotherapy start (adjusted odds ratio 2.05; 95% CI, 1.49 to 2.81). Physicians identified significant delays in access to radiation and surgical services, diagnostic tests, and supportive care. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted global cancer care. Although changes to health care delivery are a necessary response to this global crisis, our study highlights the significant disruption and changes to the treatment plans of patients with cancer in LATAM resulting from the COVID-19 health care crisis.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Neoplasias , Estudos Transversais , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , América Latina/epidemiologia , Neoplasias/terapia , Pandemias , Assistência ao Paciente , SARS-CoV-2
3.
Lung Cancer ; 152: 119-126, 2021 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33385737

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) has shown high rates of local control and prolonged survival in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), though its role in oligometastatic disease is undefined. This study aimed to evaluate SABR as a local consolidative therapy (LCT) in oligometastatic NSCLC patients. METHODS: In this prospective, single-arm phase 2 trial, we sought to evaluate SABR in patients with stage IV NSCLC, with ≤ five lesions, including the primary tumor. Patients received initial systemic therapy according to international guidelines. Patients without progression after front-line therapy (two months of targeted therapy and ≥ four cycles of chemotherapy) were evaluated by an 18F-FDG-PET/CT to receive consolidative SABR (45-60 Gy in 3-5 fractions) to the primary and all intrapulmonary metastatic sites. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and toxicity. RESULTS: A total of 47 patients were included. Mean age was 58.9 years, 59.6 % were female, 87.2 % had adenocarcinoma histology, and the contralateral lung was the main site of metastases in 42.6 %. All patients received systemic front-line therapy, chemotherapy in 61.7 %, and a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in 38.3 %. Disease control rate (DCR) and complete metabolic response (CMR) to SABR were 93.6 % and 70.2 %. Median PFS was 34.3 months (95 %CI; 31.1-38.8) for the total cohort; patients with a CMR had a median PFS of 53.9 monthsvs.31.9 months in those without CMR (p = 0.011). Median OS was not reached.Grade 1, 2, and 3 pneumonitis were observed in 79.5 % (31/39), 12.8 % (5/39) and 7.7 % (3/39), respectively. No grade ≥4 toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION: The use of SABR as LCT in oligometastatic NSCLC patients was well tolerated and showed favorable results regarding PFS and OS compared with historical data. The benefit was significantly higher in patients who reached a CMR as assessed by 18F-FDG-PET/CT.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Radiocirurgia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/radioterapia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada , Intervalo Livre de Progressão , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Thorac Cancer ; 11(12): 3448-3455, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33030313

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) represents a major challenge for oncologists. Multimodality treatment, which generally involves induction chemotherapy, surgery and radiotherapy have recently shown promising results. The aim of this study was to evaluate the locoregional control and toxicity of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) after pleurectomy and decortication (P/D) as part of trimodality therapy for patients with locally advanced MPM. METHODS: We prospectively analyzed data from 20 patients with MPM treated at a single tertiary-care institution. Initially every patient received induction chemotherapy with platinum-based chemotherapy. After chemotherapy, patients without progression underwent P/D, and if feasible, hemi-thoracic IMRT was administered at a planned dose of 50.4-54 Gy in 28-30 fractions and treated with 9-11 noncoplanar fields. RESULTS: A total of 15 of the 20 enrolled patients underwent P/D followed by IMRT to the hemi-thoracic cavity. The median total radiotherapy dose was 48.7 Gy (23.4-54 Gy). Radiation pneumonitis (RP) developed in nine patients (60%), and of these, two patients (13.3%) experienced G3 or G4 RP. The estimated locoregional-relapse-free survival at two years was 75.9%, and the main pattern of recurrence was distant (72.7%). For the entire cohort median follow-up was 22.7 months, median progression-free survival was 18.9 months and median overall survival 23.6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Platinum-based chemotherapy followed by lung-sparing surgery (P/D) and IMRT is a feasible and safe treatment modality that yields acceptable locoregional control in patients with locally advanced MPM; however, these results should be corroborated in larger studies.


Assuntos
Mesotelioma Maligno/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pleurais/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pleurais/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mesotelioma Maligno/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada/métodos
5.
Thorac Cancer ; 11(8): 2370-2375, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32627963

RESUMO

To date, the impact, timeline and duration of COVID-19 pandemic remains unknown and more than ever it is necessary to provide safe pathways for cancer patients. Multiple triage systems for nonemergent surgical procedures have been published, but potentially curative cancer procedures are essential surgery rather than elective surgery. In the present and future scenario of our country, thoracic oncology teams may have the difficult decision of weighing the utility of surgical intervention against the risk for inadvertent COVID-19 exposure for patients and medical staff. In consequence, traditional pathways of surgical care must be adjusted to reduce the risk of infection and the use of resources. It is recommended that all thoracic cancer patients should be offered treatment according to the accepted standard of care until shortage of services require a progressive reduction in surgical cases. Here, we present a consensus of recommendations discussed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts on thoracic oncology and based on the best available evidence, and hope it will provide a modifiable framework of guidance for local strategy planners in thoracic cancer care services in Mexico. KEY POINTS: SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS OF THE STUDY: This article provides recommendations to guarantee the continuity of surgical care for thoracic oncology cases during COVID-19 pandemic, whilst maintaining the safety of patients and medical staff. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: This guideline is the result of an expert consensus on thoracic surgical oncology with recommendations adapted to medical, economic and social realities of Mexico.


Assuntos
COVID-19/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Neoplasias Torácicas/epidemiologia , COVID-19/complicações , COVID-19/virologia , Guias como Assunto , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicações , Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/virologia , Oncologia/tendências , México/epidemiologia , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidade , Neoplasias Torácicas/complicações , Neoplasias Torácicas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Torácicas/virologia , Triagem
6.
Salud Publica Mex ; 61(3): 359-414, 2019.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31276353

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Lung cancer is one the leading causes of mortality worldwide. Symptomatic manifestations of the disease generally occur in the advanced-stage setting, and therefore an important number of patients have advanced or metastatic disease by the time they are diagnosed. This situation contributes to a poor prognosis in the treatment of lung cancer. Evidencebased clinical recommendations are of great value to support decision-making for daily practice, and thus improving health care quality and patient outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This document was an initiative of the Mexican Society of Oncology (SMEO) in collaboration with Mexican Center of Clinical Excellence (Cenetec) according to Interna- tional Standards. Such standards included those described by the IOM, NICE, SIGN and GI-N. An interdisciplinary Guideline Development Group (GDG) was put together which included medical oncologists, surgical oncologistsc, radiation therapists, and methodologists with expertise in critical appraisal, sys- tematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines development. RESULTS: 62 clinical questions were agreed among members of the GDG. With the evidence identified from systematic reviews, the GDG developed clinical recommendations using a Modified Delphi Panel technique. Patients' representatives validated them. CONCLUSIONS: These Clinical Practice Guideline aims to support the shared decision-making process for patients with different stages of non-small cell lung cancer. Our goal is to improve health-care quality on these patients.


OBJETIVO: El cáncer de pulmón es una de las principales causas de mortalidad alrededor del mundo. Su historia natural, con la manifestación de síntomas en etapas avanzadas y el retraso en su diagnóstico hacen que una gran proporción de pacientes se diagnostiquen en estadios tardíos de la enfermedad, lo que hace muy complicado el tratamiento exitoso de la misma. De esto deriva la importancia de dar origen a recomendaciones basadas en evidencia para soportar la toma de decisiones clínicas por parte de los grupos interdisicplinarios que se encargan del manejo de este padecimiento. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Este documento se desarrolló por parte de la Sociedad Mexicana de Oncología en colaboración con el Centro Nacional de Excelencia Tec- nológica de México (Cenetec) a través de la dirección de integración de Guías de Práctica Clínica en cumplimiento a estándares internacionales como los descritos por el Ins- tituto de Medicina de EUA (IOM, por sus siglas en inglés), el Instituto de Excelencia Clínica de Gran Bretaña (NICE, por sus siglas en inglés), la Red Colegiada para el Desarrollo de Guías de Escocia (SIGN, por sus siglas en inglés), la Red Internacional de Guías (G-I-N, por sus siglas en inglés); entre otros. Se integró en representación de la Sociedad Mexicana de Oncología un Grupo de Desarrollo de la Guía (GDG) de manera interdisciplinaria, considerando oncólogos médicos, cirujanos oncólogos, cirujanos de tórax, radio-oncólogos, y metodólogos con experiencia en revisiones sistemáticas de la literatura y guías de práctica clínica. RESULTADOS: Se consensuaron 62 preguntas cllínicas que abarcaron lo establecido previamente por el GDG en el documento de alcances de la Guía. Se identificó la evidencia científica que responde a cada una de estas preguntas clínicas y se evaluó críticamente la misma, antes de ser incorporada en el cuerpo de evidencia de la Guía. El GDG acordó mediante la técnica de consenso formal de expertos Panel Delphi la redacción final de las recomendaciones clínicas. C. CONCLUSIONES: Esta Guía de Práctica Clínica pretende proveer recomendaciones clínicas para el manejo de los distintos estadios de la enfermedad y que asistan en el proceso de toma de decisiones compartida. El GDG espera que esta guía contribuya a mejorar la calidad de la atención clínica en las pacientes con cáncer de pulmón de células no pequeñas.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Algoritmos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/secundário , Intervenção Médica Precoce , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias
7.
J Thorac Dis ; 11(2): 595-601, 2019 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30963004

RESUMO

Malignant pleural effusion (MPE) is an indicator of advanced disease (stage M1a) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Typically, these patients are candidates for palliative treatment. There is a lack of evidence about the radical surgical treatment in carcinomatous pleuritis with massive effusion. Here, we present data from a specific subset of patients with MPE treated with systemic therapy and aggressive surgical therapy. M1a NSCLC adenocarcinoma patients with MPE and without extra-thoracic disease were included. After receiving systemic therapy, all patients underwent surgical treatment, which included pneumonectomy or lobectomy, plus mediastinal dissection. Following surgery, patients received radiotherapy to thoracic wall and mediastinum. A total of six patients were analyzed. All patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤1, two patients harbored EGFR mutation and were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the other four patients were treated with pemetrexed and platin as first-line treatment. Following systemic therapy, two patients had a pneumonectomy, four patients had a lobectomy plus pleurectomy performed. All patients continued with maintenance systemic therapy, and achieved complete responses, according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. The media progression-free survival (PFS) time was 15.9 months (95% CI: 15.6-55.5 months). At the last follow-up, all patients were still alive, with 4 of them without signs of macroscopic tumoral activity. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached. NSCLC patients with MPE without extra-thoracic disease could benefit from an aggressive surgical approach following standard of care systemic therapy. However, considering the low sample size of this study and the relatively low incidence of MPE without extra-thoracic disease, further prospective multi-center studies are necessary to evaluate aggressive surgery as a therapeutic option.

8.
Lung Cancer ; 130: 67-75, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30885354

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Evidence is rapidly accumulating for the use of radical consolidative treatment (RCT) for patients with oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nonetheless, published studies have several limitations, including a selection of patients whose favorable characteristics might dictate therapeutic success, as well as scarce prospective data regarding overall survival (OS). The objective of this study was to determine whether RCT increases OS in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective, single-arm phase II study, we sought to evaluate the efficacy of RCT in patients with oligometastatic NSCLC in terms of OS. Patients with pathologically confirmed stage IV NSCLC who presented ≤5 synchronous, any-site metastases (including central nervous system [CNS] metastases), as assessed by PET-CT, were included. All patients received four initial cycles of systemic treatment. Following, those with stable disease/partial response received RCT to the primary site and metastases. The response to RCT was evaluated with PET-CT. The primary end-point was OS. Secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS) and best response by PET-CT. The study is registered in clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02805530). RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were included in the analysis. The mean age was 55.8 years (range: 33-75 years). At diagnosis, 43.2% of patients presented with CNS metastases. Following RCT, 19 (51.4%) patients achieved a complete-response (CR) by PET-CT, while 18 (48.6%) had a non-complete response (NON-CR). The median OS was nonreached (NR) and was positively affected by CR on PET-CT (NR vs. 27.4 [95% CI: 16.4-38.3]; p = 0.011). The median PFS was 23.5 months (95% CI: 13.6-33.3) and was positively affected by CR on PET-CT (NR vs. 14.3 [95% CI: 11.7-16.9]; p < 0.001; HR: 0.19 [0.07-0.52]; p=0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with oligometastatic NSCLC who undergo RCT have a high response rate and favorable OS. Patients with a CR by PET-CT have significantly longer OS, rendering this an important potential prognostic marker.


Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas , Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons , Estudos Prospectivos , Indução de Remissão , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do Tratamento
9.
J Thorac Dis ; 10(6): 3473-3481, 2018 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30069343

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Primary tumors of the thymus are rare; the most common histologic type is thymoma. Most important prognostic factors are anatomical extent of tumor and completeness of surgical resection. Large size has not been directly associated with survival, but is strongly associated with advanced disease and high rates of incomplete resections. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of patients who underwent thymectomy for thymomas of 5 cm or larger at the National Cancer Institute (INCan) of México from January 2005 to December 2016 was analyzed. Primary end-points were rate of complete resection, morbidity and mortality of thymectomy. Secondary end-points were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: A total of 25 patients were identified and included in the final analysis. Mean age was 56.6 years (27-82 years). Median size of thymoma was 8.3 cm (5-14 cm). Transesternal approach was used in 72% of cases, most of cases (68%) required an extended resection to achieve negative margins. Complete resection was achieved on 23 cases (92%). A 90-day morbidity of 24% and mortality of 8% was found, with a median follow-up of 34.5 months (1-113 months). The only factor associated with OS was completeness of surgical resection (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Size of thymomas should not be considered as a contraindication for surgical treatment. Our data suggest that extended surgery is feasible even in advanced cases and provides the best chance for cure. Complete resection remains as one of the most important prognostic factor in thymomas and is associated with prolonged DFS and OS.

10.
Salud Publica Mex ; 58(2): 274-8, 2016 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27557385

RESUMO

The management of lung cancer is challenging. However, nowadays the main goal is to achieve a significant overall survival accompanied by a good quality of life. Because smoking is associated with up to 71% of cancer deaths, the first policy that should be established is one that promotes strategies for healthy lifestyles by providing information about lung cancer, risk factors, protection factors, and precautionary data. Furthermore, an effective screening method that would allow early diagnosis should be established. Following diagnosis, the patient should be genotyped to identify predisposing mutations to give personalized medicine to the patient. The health system policies should include information that affects the health of the population and simultaneously allows for early diagnoses, resulting in a higher survival rate.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares/prevenção & controle , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/organização & administração , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Criança , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Genótipo , Política de Saúde , Promoção da Saúde , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Masculino , México/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medicina de Precisão , Prevenção Primária/organização & administração , Prevenção Secundária/organização & administração , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Adulto Jovem
11.
Oncology ; 91(4): 185-193, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27449344

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Up-to-date oncological therapy has been accomplished through the results of clinical trials (CTs). We analyzed the overall survival (OS) of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and its relation to CT enrollment. METHODS: The study included 1,042 patients with advanced NSCLC treated at the Instituto Nacional de Cancerología. All patients received treatment according to the national and international guidelines. Data were collected from medical records. Patients were subgrouped on the basis of their CT enrollment as follows: participants in any CT (ACT), exclusively intervention CTs (ICT) or exclusively pharmaceutical-sponsored CTs (PCT). RESULTS: The CT enrollment effect was assessed through a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model. Thirty percent of the patients were in ACT, 28.3% in ICT and 13.7% in PCT. Female gender (p = 0.001), adenocarcinoma histology (p = 0.018), positive EGFR mutation (p = 0.006), and better ECOG performance status (<2) (p ≤ 0.0001) were more frequent in patients enrolled in CT; further, tobacco smoking (p ≤ 0.0001) and KRAS mutation (p = 0.001) were more frequent in patients who were not enrolled in a CT. CONCLUSION: Enrollment in ACT was associated with a better OS (hazard ratio: 0.47-0.74). NSCLC patients enrolled in a CT have an improved survival in an independent manner to other prognostic factors.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/mortalidade , Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Participação do Paciente , Idoso , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/genética , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Receptores ErbB/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/genética , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas p21(ras)/genética , Fatores Sexuais , Fumar , Taxa de Sobrevida
12.
Ultrastruct Pathol ; 40(5): 254-60, 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27405014

RESUMO

The diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is challenging and requires immunohistochemistry or electron microscopy assays to specifically differentiate MPM from lung adenocarcinoma. An ultrastructural study of fresh tissue is considered to be the "gold standard." In most cases, the first diagnostic approach is performed on pleural effusion, and in some patients, this is the only available sample for diagnosis. The aim of the present study is to evaluate if an examination of pleural effusion samples based on electron microscopy (EMpe) is a useful tool for the differential diagnosis of MPM and lung adenocarcinoma. An EMpe study was performed in 25 pleural effusion samples. Histological and immunohistochemical markers confirmed the diagnosis of either mesothelioma (5) or adenocarcinoma (20). Of the five cases that were diagnosed with mesothelioma, two samples (40%) showed cells with "bushy" microvilli, which are characteristic of mesothelioma, by EMpe, and three were acellular (60%). Of the 20 cases of adenocarcinoma, EMpe showed cells with short microvilli in 9 (45%), and 11 were acellular (55%). EMpe identifies unequivocal morphological changes that are useful for the differential diagnosis of MPM or adenocarcinoma when the pleural effusion sample contains evaluable tumor cells.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Mesotelioma/diagnóstico , Derrame Pleural Maligno/patologia , Neoplasias Pleurais/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/ultraestrutura , Adenocarcinoma de Pulmão , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores Tumorais/análise , Citodiagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Feminino , Humanos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Neoplasias Pulmonares/ultraestrutura , Masculino , Mesotelioma/ultraestrutura , Microscopia Eletrônica de Transmissão , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias Pleurais/ultraestrutura
13.
Salud pública Méx ; 58(2): 274-278, Mar.-Apr. 2016.
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: lil-792995

RESUMO

Abstract The management of lung cancer is challenging. However, nowadays the main goal is to achieve a significant overall survival accompanied by a good quality of life. Because smoking is associated with up to 71% of cancer deaths, the first policy that should be established is one that promotes strategies for healthy lifestyles by providing information about lung cancer, risk factors, protection factors, and precautionary data. Furthermore, an effective screening method that would allow early diagnosis should be established. Following diagnosis, the patient should be genotyped to identify predisposing mutations to give personalized medicine to the patient. The health system policies should include information that affects the health of the population and simultaneously allows for early diagnoses, resulting in a higher survival rate.


Resumen El manejo del cáncer de pulmón es un reto que tiene como objetivo una supervivencia global significativa que se vea rodeada de una buena calidad de vida. Si se considera que el tabaquismo está asociado hasta con 71% de las muertes por cáncer, la primera política que debe establecerse es la de proporcionar información sobre el cáncer de pulmón, factores de riesgo, factores de protección y datos de alarma mediante una estrategia de salud de línea de vida, además del establecimiento de un método de tamizaje efectivo que permita un diagnóstico temprano. Después del diagnóstico, debe realizarse una genotipificación para identificar mutaciones sensibles y para proporcionar un tratamiento personalizado al paciente. Las políticas del sistema de salud deben incluir información para que la población incida en su salud y también se puedan realizar diagnósticos tempranos que permitan una mayor supervivencia.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Criança , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Adulto Jovem , Serviços Preventivos de Saúde/organização & administração , Neoplasias Pulmonares/prevenção & controle , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/organização & administração , Prevenção Primária/organização & administração , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Prevenção Secundária/organização & administração , Medicina de Precisão , Prevenção do Hábito de Fumar , Genótipo , Política de Saúde , Promoção da Saúde , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , México/epidemiologia
14.
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol ; 73(5): 975-82, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24687408

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Low-dose, prolonged infusion of gemcitabine has effects similar to standard doses in several cancers. We evaluated the toxicity and efficacy of low-dose gemcitabine in prolonged infusion plus cisplatin in patients with advanced pleural mesothelioma. METHODS: Patients with mesothelioma received gemcitabine (250 mg/m(2)) in a 6-h infusion plus cisplatin (35 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8 every three weeks. We used the modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumours. This study is registered in clinical trials (NCT01869023). RESULTS: We included 39 patients; 82.1 % were low risk according to the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer prognostic group. Partial response was observed in 53.8 % (21/39), stable disease in 33.3 % (13/39) and progression in 12.8 % (5/39). The median progression-free survival was 6.9 months (95 % CI 3.2-10.6 months), and the associated factors were the EORTC risk and histology. The median overall survival was 20.7 months (95 % CI 10.7-30.8 months). The functional, physical and emotional roles and dyspnoea, insomnia and pain symptom scales improved. The most commonly graded 3/4 side effects were neutropenia (24.4 %), lymphopenia (14.6 %), thrombocytopenia (14.7 %) and anaemia (12.2 %). CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose, prolonged gemcitabine infusion plus cisplatin has acceptable toxicity and high efficacy with improved quality of life, representing an affordable regimen for the low-income population.


Assuntos
Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Cisplatino/uso terapêutico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Mesotelioma/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antimetabólitos Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Cisplatino/administração & dosagem , Cisplatino/efeitos adversos , Desoxicitidina/administração & dosagem , Desoxicitidina/efeitos adversos , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Masculino , Mesotelioma/mortalidade , Mesotelioma Maligno , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Qualidade de Vida , Análise de Sobrevida , Gencitabina
15.
Tob Induc Dis ; 12(1): 25, 2014.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25653577

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Smoking is a public health problem in Mexico and worldwide; its economic impact on developing countries has not been well documented. The aim of this study was to assess the direct medical costs attributable to smoking incurred by lung cancer patients treated at the National Cancer Institute of Mexico (INCan). METHODS: The study was conducted at INCan in 2009. We carried out a cost of illness (COI) methodology, using data derived from an expert panel consensus and from medical chart review. A panel of experts developed a diagnostic-therapeutic guide that combined the hospital patient pathways and the infrastructure, human resources, technology, and services provided by the medical units at INCan. Cost estimates in Mexican pesos were adjusted by inflation and converted into US Dollars using the 2013 FIX exchange rate for foreign transactions (1 USD = 13.06 Mexican pesos). RESULTS: A 297 incident cases diagnosed with any type of lung cancer were analyzed. According to clinical stage, the costs per patient were 13,456; 35,648; 106,186; and 144,555 USD, for lung cancer stages I, II, III, and IV respectively. The weighted average annual cost/patient was and 139,801 USD and the average annual cost/patient that was attributable to smoking was 92,269 USD. This cost was independent of the clinical stage, with stage IV representing 96% of the annual cost. The total annual cost of smoking-related lung cancer at INCan was 19,969,781 USD. CONCLUSIONS: The medical care costs of lung cancer attributable to smoking represent a high cost both for INCan and the Mexican health sector. These costs could be reduced if all provisions established in the Framework Convention of Tobacco Control of the World Health Organization were implemented in Mexico.

16.
Rev Invest Clin ; 65 Suppl 1: S5-84, 2013 Mar.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24459776

RESUMO

Mexican specialists in oncology, oncologic surgery, thoracic surgery, pneumology, pathology, molecular biology, anesthesiology, algology, psychology, nutrition, and rehabilitation (all of them experts in lung cancer treatment) in order to develop the National Consensus on Lung Cancer. The consensus has been developed as an answer to the need of updated Mexican guidelines for the optimal treatment of the disease, as well as to the requirements that such guidelines be established by multidisciplinary panel, depicting the current attention given to cancer lung cases in Mexico. Thus, this paper analyses the epidemiological review, screening, diagnosis, staging, pathology, translational medicine, and the suitable therapies for early, locally advanced, and metastatic disease in the first, second, and third lines of management, as well as rehabilitation and palliative measures.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/terapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Algoritmos , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/complicações , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/etiologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/secundário , Árvores de Decisões , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/complicações , Neoplasias Pulmonares/etiologia , México , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Fumar/efeitos adversos
17.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 20(6): 1941-8, 2013 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23263699

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Symptoms of depression and anxiety are common in patients with lung cancer and may produce an impact on both health-related quality of life (HRQL) and survival. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association of depression and anxiety on HRQL, treatment adherence, and prognosis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: This is a prospective study of patients with stage IIIB or IV NSCLC. Depression and anxiety were measured using the hospital anxiety and depression scale, the International Neuropsychiatric Interview, and the HRQL with the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 questionnaires. Instruments were applied before treatment and repeated at 3 and 6 months. Lack of treatment adherence was considered as patients who stopped going to their consultation appointments. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients were included. At the initial evaluation, depression and anxiety were found in 32.9 and 34.1 % of patients, respectively. Depression was associated with feminine gender (p = 0.034) and poor performance status (p = 0.048). Depression and anxiety showed an association with HRQL. Patients with depression showed median overall survival of 6.8 months, whereas that for nondepressed patients was 14 months (hazard ratio [HR], 1.9; 95 % confidence interval (95 % CI), 1.03-3.7; p = 0.042). The 58 % of patients with depression had poor treatment adherence versus 42 % of patients without depression (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Depression and anxiety were present in one-third of patients with recently diagnosed NSCLC. Depression and anxiety were associated with decreased HRQL scales, and depression was independently associated with treatment adherence and with poor prognosis.


Assuntos
Ansiedade/psicologia , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/psicologia , Depressão/psicologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Idoso , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Depressão/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Avaliação de Estado de Karnofsky , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Cooperação do Paciente/psicologia , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Estudos Prospectivos , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Inquéritos e Questionários
18.
Surg Oncol ; 21(3): 237-44, 2012 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22749804

RESUMO

Lung metastasectomy is an area of interest and controversy in surgical oncology. Most of the available evidence derives from small cohorts with short follow-up. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncologic outcomes in an 18-year cohort from a single center. We retrospectively reviewed 398 patients with several malignancies who underwent lung metastasectomy between January 1990 and December 2008. Demographic, clinical, and surgical variables were evaluated. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with overall survival (OS). Mean follow-up was 20 months. Wedge resection was performed in 297 cases and 101 required anatomic resections. In 303 patients the disease-free interval (DFI) was >6 months meanwhile 95 patients had a DFI ≤6 months. Complete resection was achieved in 351 patients (88.2%). Median OS for all patients was 81.9 months (95% CI, 36.9-126.9). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with a poor overall survival were DFI <6 months (HR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.24-2.4; p=0.001) and incomplete resection (HR, 1.58 95% CI, 1.01-2.5; p=0.0047). Independent prognostic factors associated with better survival were DFI >6 months and complete resection. Size and number of metastases as well as re-do metastasectomy were not associated with worse survival.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares/cirurgia , Metastasectomia/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidade , Neoplasias Pulmonares/secundário , Masculino , Metastasectomia/mortalidade , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
19.
Cir Cir ; 75(1): 25-9, 2007.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17470321

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Appendectomy is the most common non-elective surgery. The postoperative use of antibiotics depends on the stage of the appendix at the time of surgery. Several classifications establish that state. We determine if these classifications are known and used by Mexican surgeons. METHODS: A descriptive and observational study was performed. A questionnaire was completed by surgeons asking the following questions: Do you use a classification for acute appendicitis? 2) Which classification do you prefer? 3) Do you use antibiotics postoperatively? 4) For what period of time do you administer antibiotics postoperatively? We evaluated if the postoperative treatment is influenced by the use of a classification, using the chi(2) test. RESULTS: One hundred and forty two surgeons were interviewed, 99% used a classification, and 48% indicated postoperative antibiotics, despite the stage of the disease, monotherapy (69%), and for three doses (60%). Fifty two percent used antibiotic only in advanced stages, with two different types (61%), and from 7 to 10 days (66%). We did not find any statistical difference in management, regardless of whether or not an appendicitis classification was used. CONCLUSIONS: Although most surgeons use one classification for acute appendicitis, this does not influence postoperative treatment. This incongruity results in the unjustified use of antibiotics.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Apendicectomia , Apendicite/cirurgia , Apendicite/classificação , Prescrições de Medicamentos/normas , Humanos , México , Cuidados Pós-Operatórios , Padrões de Prática Médica , Inquéritos e Questionários
20.
Gac Med Mex ; 141(5): 417-9, 2005.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16353887

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The trichobezoars are conglomerates of hair ingested by a person. They are located in the stomach, although they can extend also to the small bowel. They are common in children and adolescents, and 90% of the patients are women. An occasional complication is mechanical obstruction, usually at the gastric level or in the small bowel. It is extremely rare to find trichobezoars in the small bowel without a gastric component. CASE REPORT: A 18 year-old female patient was admitted for small bowel obstruction. Three weeks before she had underwent appendectomy. Laparotomy was performed identifying three trichobezoars occluding the jejune, without evidence of gastric bezoars. The bezoars were extracted by enterotomy. No post-operatory complications were presented. CONCLUSIONS: Trichobezoars are a rare entity that may be complicated by bowel obstruction. The discovery of trichobezoars in the bowel may be due to primary formation, which is improbable, or to fragmentation in the stomach followed by migration of the fragments, which in the case presented could be favored by the patient's previous operation.


Assuntos
Bezoares/complicações , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Jejuno , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...